Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- October 2011
- July 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
News & Views- Why cheat Medicare? Because that's where the money is, Texan explains May. 10, 2012
- Fort Worth police arrest about 60 in four gambling raids May. 7, 2012
- Voters had no say as DFW cities took on debt Apr. 16, 2012
- Fort Worth police chief warns: City needs more cops Apr. 14, 2012
- Tax service's Lady Liberty gets paid to wave, but not to litter Apr. 12, 2012
- North Texas Cities Food Trucks Surge In Popularity Mar. 31, 2012
- Not forgotten: Fort Worth teams reach out to homeless mentally ill Mar. 24, 2012
- Covington citizens feel safer after police chief's arrest Mar. 15, 2012







Constitution Bla Bla Bla
I saw a very revealing quote that someone posted recently. It was an Albert Einstein quote about the United States constitution.
Can anyone imagine saying something like that about any sector of society other than government?
Of course not. If we didn’t like their products we wouldn’t give them business. More than anything, it just goes to show how ineffective government is at protecting liberties and how silly the idea of a constitution is if the very organization it is meant to restrain is given a monopoly on interpreting it and discretion when enforcing it. From personal experience, I have observed that many in the liberty movement are pro-market and believe government as it now exists (individually nonconsensual and territorially monopolistic) is necessary for the free market to function. What does that say about the market if that were true? Government “asks” that we surrender fundamental liberties for the common good. The police, military, and judicial system are all run by the government. I wondered if it has ever crossed their minds why a socialist-like organization is needed to defend the free market.
Since the founding of the current constitution, it was believed that private interests in each of the branches of the government would keep any one branch from becoming too powerful. Instead, what has happened is that each branch has coordinated together to seize more and more power simultaneously. It must be frustrating that the government designed to be the most protective of individual rights has become the most dangerous threat to those rights in the history of civilization, a government powerful enough to destroy the world many times over with its thermonuclear weapons. George Washington probably owes George III a belated apology.
Now, I would be thrilled to return to constitutional government (my interpretation of constitutional government), and someday we might. I’d insist on going further and remove the parasite entirely. That will take changing people’s ideas of how society might function in a stateless society. That can be achieved simultaneously with the shrinkage of the state by undermining its legitimacy so that people no longer believe it is necessary. That is as simple as mocking it when people in government make some boneheaded mistake (When aren’t they?), offering better competing products and services, and educating others of the value of liberty and peace.
That’s all. I assure you that it will be worth the effort.